28 October 2015

Crow Nation's Difficult Alliance with Big Coal

Screenshot of Report on WNYC The Takeaway
The Takeaway: Crow Nation Coal Income Conundrum

The Apsaalook√© or Biiluuke tribe, a Native American Crow Nation based in Montana, is among the groups whose livelihood is tied to tough decisions about coal. Ironically, despite "a mythology that casts them as stewards of the earth working in harmony with the land," explained a public radio piece, native peoples have been deprived of most of their original land and left with limited resources with which to support themselves. 

On WNYC's The Takeaway, Amy Martin, a freelance producer who has reported on the subject told host John Hockenberry @JHockenberry that

For the Crow, this really comes down to self-sufficiency. In the case of the Crow, they have this resource—they have about 9 billion tons of coal on their reservation. At least for most of the people I’ve talked to, that feels like a way to pull themselves out of poverty, to provide for their families, and provide for their community.

Unemployment and Few Economic Levers to Pull

With unemployment on the reservation running at more than 25%, scarce housing, and an inability to pay for basic services, the nation's chairman, Darrin Old Coyote explained to Martin why it is a coal advocate with few detractors among the tribe:

Assimilation, warfare, smallpox—all of that we’ve survived. And we’re ‘gonna continue moving forward to survive, and the only way I know how now is to develop our coal. What I’m doing is in the best interest of my people.

Whether the Crow Nation's plans to build a second coal mine with Cloud Peak Energy in an era when more than 60 coal-burning power plants have been shut down can come to fruition is unclear. For one thing, the Crow Nation faces objections from environmentalists and, ironically, other tribes in its aim to build new ports in Washington state. With coal prices at a 10-year low, and domestic consumption hardly a growth industry, specialists have said that new ports are thought needed to export the coal to foreign markets. 

Such plans would also face opposition from successful campaigns such as the Sierra Club's Bloomberg-financed Beyond Coal.

Lessons from West Virginia 

Two thousand miles away, much of the state of West Virginia is in the throes of equally wrenching decisions about its relationship to coal. A Washington Post report in 2014 surveyed several studies of the impact of coal on the central Appalachian region.  It asked whether the "resource curse" associated with African countries also afflicts areas of the U.S. associated with long term coal mining operations. There is considerable evidence to support the conclusion, as many of the areas of high poverty levels and lower incomes are clustered in coal-heavy regions. 

For many West Virginians, the relationship with coal is openly rueful. Theirs had been a bountiful connection until the full impact of the industry on the state's environment became clearer, and even now the heyday of coal is seen by many as a better day. It was an addiction of consumption in which the entire nation indulged, but whose withdrawal is impacting West Virginia far more than California or New York. 

As is the case with the Crow Nation, West Virginia citizens are left to cope with the economic disruption of coal's fall from favor. It explains much of the seeming indifference to coal's impact on climate change.

And there is the environmental impact. As Bennington College student and Coal River Mountain Watch intern Emily Sanders wrote after two stints in the state:
As much as I had read about this strip-mining practice used to extract coal in the cheapest, dirtiest, and most profitable way possible, I could not begin to understand the way it infused disaster . . . I had looked out the window of the plane and seen gaping, moon-like craters in the mountains like chunks blown out of a radiated head. Once arrived, walking down the snowy driveway of the hollow and feeling the underworld shudder with a muffled boom made my skin feel raw. Danger was by no means a threat posed to the mountains alone. Mountaintop removal made a weapon out of nature itself. 
Reporter Any Martin's @AmyMartinMT full piece, "Why Montana's Crow Tribe Turns to Coal as Other Turn Away," is at, a public media collaborative.

11 August 2015

Cheating at Western Water Supply Counting

The fastest, cheapest way to reach artificial sustainability goals?  Cheat.

When it comes to Western water supplies, that's the conclusion of Abrahm Lustgarten, senior reporter at ProPublica (@AbrahmL). As part of his series with Matter called "Killing the Colorado" which appeared in the New York Times,  my former home state of Arizona faces circumstances the report calls "dire":

. . . calculations based on Arizona’s own water accounting suggest that demand could outpace its existing water supply in less than a decade. But its laws still don’t require an accurate joining of its surface water and groundwater supplies.

Is "cheat" too strong a word for this politically motivated indifference to hydrology? Probably not when compared to the political fireworks that will play out when the state runs out of water -- a decade or so at current run rates, and taking into account the regional drought.

Image Credit: Robert Lesser 

03 April 2015

Frog Future Further Fraught

Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog - CA Dept Fish & Game
Leonard Lopate (@leonardlopate) hosted Robin Moore (@robindmoore), author of In Search of Lost Frogs. Moore cited a recent trip in Northern California during which he searched for the mountain yellow-legged frog. It, like many other amphibian species in the U.S., is declining in numbers at an alarming pace.